To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Plant-based burger analogues (PBBAs) are commercially considered as alternative products to meat-based burgers (MBBs), but do not present the similarity in nutritional profile. Differences related to the formulation of products and their behavior during the gastrointestinal digestion process can directly impact the absorption of essential nutrients such as proteins, formed by amino acids joined by peptide bonds. Thus, the aim of the study to investigate the release of amino acids and the degree of hydrolysis (DH%) induced by the enzymatic activity after in vitro gastrointestinal digestion of PBBAs (chickpea and soybean) and beef MBB marketed in Brazil. Samples were roasted, ground, and homogenized to perform the assays in triplicate. The simulation of in vitro digestion followed the standardized INFOGEST 2.0 protocol. The free amino acids (FAA) content was determined following o-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) method, after discounting analytical blank. The DH% was determined by the ratio between the FAA content of the in natura and hydrolyzed samples. The highest average FAA content and DH% were obtained in beef MBB (11573.33 mg NH2 L-1, 95.43%) and soybean PBBA (10074.77 mg NH2 L-1, 95.30%), which did not differ statistically by the Tukey HSD test (95% confidence interval). The lowest average and significantly different FAA and DH% were found in chickpea PBBA (4648.33 mg NH2 L-1, 79.14%). The results showed that soybean PBBA have high FAA content and digestibility comparable to beef MBB. The lower release of NH2 groups of the chickpea PBBA could have been associated with nutrients' interferences to the digestive proteases, such as total fiber and polyphenols content in plant-based samples. Future studies are needed to know the amino acids profile present in these analogue products, as scientific literature reports that there are differences in the nutritional quality of proteins of animal and plant-based origin available for absorption.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper