To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Plant-based meat alternatives are obtained from foods that contain different vegetable proteins. The food industry is interested in products that are comparable to the nutritional, physicochemical, and sensory qualities of animal meat due to the high demand for alternative meat alternatives. In this context, it is important to evaluate the composition of the essential elements (Ca, Fe, Mg, Mn) in commercial plant-based meat alternatives, as well as to estimate their bioaccessible fractions to assess its quality. Twelve samples of plant-based chicken, ground beef, beef burger flavor, codfish cake, fish fillet, and kibbeh, as well as their meat analogues (chicken, beef, fish, and codfish) were selected. The samples were mineralized by microwave digestion using HNO3 and H2O2 and the essential elements were determined by ICP OES. The mineral bioaccessibility was evaluated using the INFOGEST 2.0 protocol. All determinations were performed in triplicate. The essential elements were determined by ICP OES Total content in plant-based ranged from (mg/100g): Ca (49.1 to 117), Cu (0.163 to 0.418), Fe (4.57 to 24.2), Mn (0.53 to 1.57); whilst meat products presented lower levels (Ca: 5.83 to 57, Cu: 0.004 to 0.152, Fe: 0.63 to 2.57, Mn: <0.04 to 0.44). For the mineral bioaccessibility, the values ranged from (%): Ca (12 to 44), Cu (47 to 80), Fe (6.7 to 29) and Mn (8.9 to 40) in plant-based samples, whilst meat products showed values: Ca (16-70), Cu (0-53), Fe (29 to 78) and Mn (0 to 66). The highest percentages observed were: Ca (ground beef); Cu (plant-based chicken); Fe (breaded tilapia fillet) and Mn (chicken and beef burger). In general, the plant-based foods studied contain higher total contents of Ca, Cu, Fe and Mn than their meat analogues. However, the Ca, Fe and Mn bioaccessibility in plant-based foods are lower comparing to the meat source.
Views per month
Galoá count, excluding known robots. Updated on 30/09/2026.
Views per month
Galoá count, excluding known robots. Updated on 30/09/2026.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper