To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
This study evaluates the performance of several satellite-based precipitation products, including GSMaP, IMERG, CHIRPS, MERGE CPTEC, and NASA POWER, using rainfall data from the agroclimatic stations of the National Institute for Agricultural Research (INIA Uruguay). Covering the period from 2014 to 2022, the analysis focuses on daily and monthly rainfall accumulations, comparing the accuracy of each product against ground observations. Results show that GSMaP and IMERG exhibit the highest accuracy for daily rainfall estimates, with R² values of 0.73 and 0.67, and RMSE values of 5.94 mm and 6.54 mm, respectively. These products offer a reliable alternative in regions with limited rain gauge data, allowing for improved spatial coverage and enhanced applications in agricultural and climate studies. Monthly analysis further validates GSMaP's superior performance, followed by NASA POWER and IMERG.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper