To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
The energy landscape theory of protein folding and machine learning/artificial intelligence have a long common history. Starting in the late 1980’s energy landscape ideas suggested that efficient folding required the selection of funneled landscapes. This insight powered the design of structure prediction codes using bioinformatic input and the success of such codes has grown over the decades. A decade ago a great leap in accuracy was achieved when the explosion of sequencing efforts enabled the efficient use of co-evolutionary analysis in machine learning. The physical and evolutionary energy landscapes are correlated. Evolutionary selection however requires not only funneled folding landscapes but also frustrated parts of the landscape that allow functional binding to targets and allosteric motions. This functional frustration shows up in the co-evolutionary analysis and improves structural predictions over what can be done based on a single sequence. I will discuss how the analysis of frustration gives insights both into the evolution and the de-evolution of proteins and the exon-intron problem. Frustration analysis can also empower machine learning tools such as Alphafold to not just predict static structures but also to uncover functional pathways of protein motion. Energy landscape ideas also provide new tools for drug design.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper