To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Characterizing genetic diversity for fruit quality traits can support germplasm management and the
identification of contrasting parents for acerola breeding. This study assessed the multivariate
diversity of 35 acerola (Malpighia emarginata DC.) genotypes at the big green and red-ripe stages
over two production cycles. The experiment followed a randomized complete block design with
three blocks per cycle. Fruit diameter, mass, firmness, soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA),
SS/TA ratio, and ascorbic acid (AA) content were evaluated. Genotypic values were predicted by
REML/BLUP separately for each maturity stage. Standardized predicted genotypic values were
used to calculate Euclidean distances, followed by hierarchical clustering using the unweighted
pair-group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA). Five groups were identified at each maturity
stage. At the big green stage, group sizes were 2, 12, 19, 1, and 1 genotypes, with the largest group
representing 54.3% of the germplasm. BRS Rubra and Okinawa formed isolated groups, indicating
distinctive multivariate profiles. At the red-ripe stage, groups comprised 2, 3, 4, 6, and 20
genotypes, with 57.1% concentrated in the largest group. Cophenetic correlations were 0.742 and
0.650 for the big green and red-ripe stages, respectively. The most divergent pairs were ACO 03 ×
BRS Rubra at the big green stage (distance = 8.10) and Camta × PROG 052 at the red-ripe stage
(8.15). Changes in group composition and in the most divergent pairs indicate that multivariate
fruit-quality diversity is maturity-dependent. Therefore, maturity stage should be considered when
characterizing acerola germplasm and identifying contrasting genotypes for breeding.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper