To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Understanding relationships among fruit quality traits can support indirect selection for nutritionally important attributes in acerola breeding. This study assessed direct and indirect relationships between fruit quality traits and ascorbic acid (AA) content in 35 acerola (Malpighia emarginata DC.) genotypes evaluated at the big green and red-ripe stages over two production cycles. The experiment followed a randomized complete block design with three blocks per cycle. Genotypic values were predicted by REML/BLUP, and path analyses were performed separately for each maturity stage, considering AA as the response variable and fruit mass, soluble solids (SS), titratable acidity (TA), and firmness as explanatory variables. Multicollinearity was negligible, with variance inflation factors below 1.21. At the big green stage, TA showed the strongest correlation with AA (0.586) and a similar positive direct effect (0.531), indicating a predominantly direct association. Firmness and SS had smaller positive direct effects (0.299 and 0.156), whereas mass had a negative effect (−0.128). At the red-ripe stage, TA showed an even stronger correlation (0.651) and direct effect (0.638), while effects of mass (−0.055), SS (−0.058), and firmness (−0.070) were small. The models explained 43.0 and 43.6% of the variation in predicted AA genotypic values at the big green and red-ripe stages, respectively. Overall, TA was the only trait with a strong, positive, and consistent direct association with AA across maturity stages, indicating its potential as an auxiliary criterion for indirect selection, although direct AA assessment remains important.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper