To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Soil organic matter (SOM) is widely recognized as a key driver of soil resilience. This study evaluated the effects of soybean-based production systems managed under no-tillage, with contrasting levels of crop diversification, on soil physical recovery and its relationship with SOM. The systems assessed included soybean monoculture–fallow, soybean in succession with ruzigrass, and a diversified rotation comprising soybean, sunn hemp, maize intercropped with ruzigrass, and ruzigrass. Undisturbed soil samples were collected from the 2.5–5.0 cm soil layer. Soil compaction and physical recovery were evaluated under controlled laboratory conditions by applying a uniaxial stress of 300 kPa, followed by successive wetting–drying cycles. Soil bulk density (Bd), air-filled porosity (εa10), and air permeability (ka10) were quantified before compaction, immediately after compaction, and after one to four wetting–drying cycles. SOM contents were higher in the succession and rotation systems than in the monoculture (53.7, 56.6, and 42.3 g kg-1, respectively). Although Bd, εa10, and ka10 did not differ among systems prior to or immediately after compaction, wetting–drying cycles promoted partial structural recovery, particularly in the rotation system, where Bd decreased from 1.26 to 1.22 Mg m-3 and εa10 increased from 0.09 to 0.13 m3 m-3 relative to the monoculture system. Despite higher SOM contents under diversified systems, soil recovery rates were not significantly correlated with SOM concentration. These findings indicate that SOM quantity alone may be insufficient to explain soil physical resilience in the short term, underscoring the importance of SOM quality, spatial organization, and its interaction with pore structure when assessing soil resilience.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper