This paper was published through Galoá and has a deposited DOI. To cite this paper, use one of the standards below:
In case you are one of the co-authors and want to register this paper in your Lattes, use the following code: doi > 10.59254/sbpo-2025-212253
If you've NEVER registered a DOI in your Lattes, check our tutorial!This article presents a bibliometric analysis of Brazilian scientific production on the use of multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methodologies between 1990 and 2025. These methodologies have been widely applied across various fields, enabling effective decision-making in complex scenarios involving multiple criteria and numerous alternatives. Based on data from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, the analysis covered publication volume, the most relevant journals, geographic distribution, and the most cited documents. The study also examined author collaborations and the main methods employed over time. The results revealed 2,095 unique documents, with the Southeast and Northeast regions standing out. The TOPSIS, AHP, and ELECTRE methods were the most frequently used, while FUZZY, FITradeoff, and SMART appeared less often but remained relevant. This analysis aims to support researchers in understanding the development of the field and to guide future investigations in the area of multicriteria decision-making in Brazil.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper