Favorite this paper
How to cite this paper?
Abstract

Though the ocean is known to be a large sink for anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2), recent estimates of the ocean carbon uptake published within the Global Carbon Budget highlight a problematic development. Since about the year 2000, estimates based on global hindcast model simulations and upscaled pCO2measurements from the surface ocean ship network (SOCAT) appear to diverge, leaving an unexplained gap between the two estimates equaling, in magnitude ~0.6-0.7 Pg C yr-1, or roughly the emissions of the EU27. Within the upscaled measurement estimate, the role of data sparsity and uncertainty have not yet been sufficiently explored which may help explain some of the differences between the two ocean sink estimates. Early work points toward significant biases in the air-sea CO2 uptake, caused by the sparsely observed Southern Hemisphere. Therefore, the Surface Ocean CO2 Mapping intercomparison project (SOCOM) has launched its second phase to better evaluate biases (the accuracy) and uncertainties (the precision) of these upscaling techniques. Here we will present the first results from 4 dedicated experiments that were designed to identify biases, linked to data sparsity, changing observing networks and data, and uncertainties linked to mapping methods, input data and the parameterization of gas transfer of CO2 across the air-sea interface. These experiments include an extensive geospatial uncertainty analysis assessing precision, and three subsampling experiments based on 1. the GCB hindcast simulations (representing true climate variability), 2. on large ensemble simulations (representing multiple climate states) and 3. on idealized carbon uptake without climate variations. These experiments will shed light on the role of data sparsity and network design on the accuracy and precision of the resulting air-sea CO2 flux and will thus pave the way for implementing new observing strategies to support the value chain and better inform policy decisions.

Share your ideas or questions with the authors!

Did you know that the greatest stimulus in scientific and cultural development is curiosity? Leave your questions or suggestions to the author!

Sign in to interact

Have a question or suggestion? Share your feedback with the authors!

Institutions
  • 1 Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ), Oostende, Belgium
  • 2 Environmental Physics, Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 3 Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  • 4 Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Bremerhaven, Germany
  • 5 Columbia University and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, New York, 10964 USA
  • 6 Max Planck Institute for Meteorology
  • 7 ETH Zurich
  • 8 University of Exeter
  • 9 Flanders Marine Institute (VLIZ)
  • 10 LSCE/IPSL
  • 11 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
  • 12 National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
  • 13 Atmosphere and Ocean Department, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, Japan
  • 14 LSCE
Track
  • 3-Measuring and modelling CO2 in the ocean
Keywords
carbon budget
Global ocean
Ocean CO2 fluxes
machine learning
measurements