To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Despite efforts by the international carbon cycle research community there remain significant differences between the global carbon budget and regionally aggregated budgets of the key greenhouse gases (GHGs) carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N2O). These differences relate to the complexity of the carbon cycle, its interactions with other cycles but also differences in methods and data used to generate the budgets. The principal budget calculations are also out of synchrony, with an annual (CO2) budget, and global CH4 and N2O budgets on a longer cycle and the Regional Carbon Assessment (RECCAP) developed every five years.
The challenge for the International Community is:
New datasets and satellite-based opportunities are emerging that may contribute to this challenge. Space-based measurements of atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and CH4 and observations of both the terrestrial and ocean carbon cycle are increasing in frequency, range, and detail. With the planned launches of key carbon relevant satellites by NASA, ESA and others, these observations will provide a unique capability to provide a dynamic reconstruction of the carbon cycle at unprecedented scales in space and time.
The ESA-NASA Carbon Budget Reconciliation Initiative has been established to help coordinate the EO satellite contributions to RECCAP and GCB internationally by:
Discussions will provide a forum for understanding new observations and GHG reporting methods.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper