Favorite this paper
How to cite this paper?
Abstract

The importance of phosphorus (P) in plant function and ecosystem biogeochemistry has led to the addition of P cycle processes into a range of vegetation models, but the predictions of these P-enabled models have rarely been evaluated with ecosystem-scale data. Here, we confronted eight state-of-the-art, P-enabled models with data from EucFACE, a P-limited Eucalyptus forest subject to long-term Free-Air CO2 Enrichment. We compiled a comprehensive ecosystem P-budget under both ambient and elevated CO2 treatment, together with the associated ecosystem carbon (C) budget, to evaluate the model prediction accuracy and the underpinning mechanisms in capturing the observed elevated CO2 responses in this forest ecosystem. Our data synthesis show a high likelihood that trees used P efficiently, but P captured by soil microbes constrained ecosystem P recycling and availability for plant uptake. In turn, plant strategies to stimulate microbial P cycling and plant P uptake may be essential for P-limited forests to increase C sequestration with rising CO2. Our data-model intercomparison show that the inclusion of P-cycle processes into models is necessary to more realistically simulate ecosystem function and biogeochemistry, but this enhanced capacity did not directly translate into improved prediction accuracy. In particular, the P-enabled models still over-estimated the CO2 fertilization effect on tree growth, with models showed diverging capability to capture the observed CO2 responses. We identify leaf-to-canopy scaling of photosynthesis, plant tissue stoichiometry, plant belowground investment and the subsequent consequence for plant-microbe interaction to be crucial areas in which models of ecosystem C-P interaction can be improved. Confronting models with experimental responses observed at EucFACE represents a valuable opportunity to improve our understanding of the C-P interaction under rising CO2, and is an important step towards more accurate predictions of the future land C sink under climate change.

Share your ideas or questions with the authors!

Did you know that the greatest stimulus in scientific and cultural development is curiosity? Leave your questions or suggestions to the author!

Sign in to interact

Have a question or suggestion? Share your feedback with the authors!

Institutions
  • 1 College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310000
  • 2 Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University
  • 3 Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Faculty of Science, Lund University, Sweden
  • 4 Western Sydney University, Australia
  • 5 Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans-Knöll-Str. 10, 07745 Jena, Germany
  • 6 Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ-Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 7 Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
  • 8 Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  • 9 Carbon-Water Research Station in Karst Regions of Northern Guangdong, School of Geography and Planning, Sun Yat-Sen University
  • 10 CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Kaurna Country, Locked Bag 2, Glen Osmond, SA, 5064, Australia
  • 11 SouthPole Environmental Services, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 12 Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich-Reckenholz, Switzerland
  • 13 Department of Biology, IVAGRO, University of Cádiz, Campus de Excelencia Internacional Agroalimentario (CeiA3)
  • 14 Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, Australia
Track
  • 13-Carbon-cycle/climate feedbacks
Keywords
mature forest
CO2 enrichment
phosphorus limitation