To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
While an extensive body of literature on representative bureaucracy suggests that factors beyond qualifications influence hiring decisions, there remains limited understanding of whether this phenomenon extends to top-level leadership positions. We investigate gender and ethnic minorities representation in the federal government, particularly in top-level leadership positions. Unlike existing research concentrating on street-level bureaucrats, our federal government dataset examines discretionary appointments for Senior Management and Advisory (DAS) positions in 76 Brazilian federal agencies from 2008 to 2022, with a deliberate focus on DAS 5 and DAS 6 positions (director and high-level consultant, respectively). Findings suggest that, as agency size increases, the top-level leadership board becomes both more diverse and meritocratic. The political orientation moderates such relationship. Left-oriented politicians demonstrate a greater inclination towards prioritizing diversity, while right-oriented counterparts display a stronger inclination towards meritocracy. We contribute to representative bureaucracy scholarship by highlighting the extension of discretionary appointments to top-level leadership positions.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper