To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Introduction
Informed consent is a core principle of research ethics, intended to ensure that every individual can make a voluntary and informed decision about participating in research. This principle assumes that participants fully understand what their involvement entails. However, obtaining informed consent becomes considerably more complex when participants experience communication challenges and often have limited perceptual abilities, as is the case for individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Goals and Methods
The aim of this presentation is to reflect on ethical dilemmas, methodological challenges, and practical strategies in conducting qualitative research with individuals who have difficulties in communication and perceptual processing. These reflections are grounded in the authors’ personal research experience as well as in relevant literature. The presentation documents an effort to identify effective ways of conveying research-related information to participants with such difficulties. Central to this discussion are two key questions: How can researchers ensure that participants understand the research they are taking part in? And how can they verify that such understanding has occurred? The research method is the grounded theory methodology in its constructivist approach. Empirical data sources come from previous projects involving these populations. The analytical method relied on open and axial coding performed by means of GT procedures.
Results
The presentation will examine the fundamental conditions for obtaining informed consent from participants with communication and perceptual limitations. It will also offer insights into how research information can be communicated effectively, including considerations on how to assess and interpret the feedback provided by participants.
Conclusions
The reflections presented contribute to the broader conversation on ethical and methodological issues in qualitative research involving individuals with communication and perceptual difficulties. The outcomes provide a foundation for formulating principles of good practice, suggested procedures for delivering research information, and recommendations for conducting research in such settings in an ethically responsible manner.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper