To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Problem Statement: Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI) represents a significant technological breakthrough with the potential to transform various sectors, including entertainment, finance, healthcare, and education. However, the ethical implications of this technology present a complex landscape that requires careful consideration and proactive measures.
Objectives: This qualitative study investigates the ethical implications of Generative AI (Gen-AI) across various sectors, exploring the potential for misuse, resulting consequences, and mitigation strategies.
Methodology: The study begins with a systematic review of relevant literature and identifying significant themes and subthemes related to each objective. Later, we conducted in-depth interviews of 15 experts from diverse fields, including entertainment, finance, education, marketing, and healthcare using a semi-structured interview schedule. Qualitative content analysis was employed to identify key themes and subthemes related to ethical concerns and potential solutions.
Findings: The study finds that unethical use of Gen-AI leads to erosion of trust and authenticity due to the proliferation of deep-fakes and misinformation. Gen-AI algorithms, if not properly designed and monitored, can perpetuate existing societal inequalities and introduce new forms of discrimination, particularly in sensitive areas like finance, education, and healthcare. The lack of transparency and explainability in AI decision-making processes further exacerbates these concerns, emphasizing the need for robust measures to ensure fairness and equity. Additionally, the study also finds that there are risks of malicious use of Gen-AI for fraud and cyberattacks, and the need for clear ethical guidelines and regulations.
Practical implications: The findings will guide the governments and corporates to take adequate measures to mitigate the ethical risks associated with Gen-AI. This includes developing robust detection tools, promoting transparency and explainability in AI systems, addressing biases, strengthening cybersecurity measures, and establishing clear ethical guidelines and regulations.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper