Favorite this paper
How to cite this paper?
Abstract

Sewage sludge (SS) contains high levels of organic matter and nutrients, which become a source of energy for soil microbial communities. Soil microbes in turn are considered a soil health indicator, due to their sensitivity to changes through agricultural management practices. Although there are many scientific studies demonstrating the benefits of recycling SS in agriculture, few studies have been carried out to evaluate the effects that long-term application of this residue can have on soil microbial biomass-C (SMBC). We aimed to understand the impact of sewage sludge application rates vs. mineral fertilizers on SMBC. A long-term experiment (28 years) was carried out under field conditions in Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil. A randomized complete block design with four treatments and five replications was used. The treatments consisted of conventional mineral fertilization (CMF) and three accumulated rates of SS (120, 240, and 427 Mg ha-1, dry basis). After SS was applied, U. ruziziensis was sown in the 2024/25 crop year, and soil samples were then collected in layers 0–0.1 m and 0.1–0.2 m deep. The soil samples were identified, refrigerated, and prepared to determine the C present in the microbial biomass, using the fumigation and extraction method with K2SO4 extractant at 0.5 mol L-1. The results were subjected to descriptive analysis. After verifying normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test, analysis of variance was performed at a 5% significance level (F test), and the means were compared using the Tukey test (p≤0.05) in R core software. There was no significant difference between treatments, in which the rate CFM presented the highest amount of SMBC (177.90 μg MBC g-1 soil), not differing from the SS treatment at the depth of 0–0.1 m. At the depth of 0.1–0.2 m, the highest averages of C in the biomass were observed in the treatments 240 and 427 Mg ha-1, being 228.66 and 206.17 μg MBC g-1 soil, respectively. Therefore, the highest rates of SS were able to provide an increase in SMBC, which in turn contributes to the greater C stocks (increase soil C sequestration and the mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions) and nutrient cycling for plants. Our results are aligned with the concepts of circular economy and the ‘Sustainable Development Goals’ (SDGs) of the UN’s ‘2030 Agenda’, with emphasis on ‘SDG2’, ‘SDG3’ and ‘SDG13’.

Share your ideas or questions with the authors!

Did you know that the greatest stimulus in scientific and cultural development is curiosity? Leave your questions or suggestions to the author!

Sign in to interact

Have a question or suggestion? Share your feedback with the authors!

Institutions
  • 1 Department of Soil Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Department of Soil Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
  • 2 Department of Exact Sciences, São Paulo State University, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Department of Exact Sciences, São Paulo State University, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
  • 3 Department of Biology and Chemistry, Department of Biology and Chemistry, California State University, Monterey Bay, CA, USA
  • 4 São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil./ Universidad de Panamá, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, David - Chiriquí, Panamá
Topic
  • Sustainable agricultural and forestry production for carbon sequestration, soil health, and food security
Keywords
sustainable agriculture
biosolid
fertilizers
urban waste