To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Remotely Piloted Aircrafts (RPA) coupled with Red-Green-Blue (RGB) sensors have a high potential to monitor Forest Restoration (FR), but multispectral sensors onboard RPA are more expensive and still demand more studies when applied to FR monitoring. This work aims to compare an RGB and a multispectral sensor capacity to measure the canopy cover of a FR project. Four canopy cover methods were evaluated using: the point cloud data generated by the RGB sensor; a vegetation index for RGB sensors; the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI); and the Near Infra-Red band (Nir) only. The point cloud data method was the most accurate and the only one that presented all accuracies greater than 0.9. However, the multispectral sensor presented more potential for scientific research because it seems to be capable of detecting different photosynthetic activities on the trees and, consequently, different responses to FR treatments, which should be confirmed by future studies.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper