To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
The adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions in healthcare depends not only on good algorithmic performance, but also on the ability to function safely and usefully in the context in which it will be used. Traditional maturity assessment instruments capture only part of this problem: the TRL scale assesses the maturity of the technology, while models such as HAIRA assess the capability of the organization. This work proposes a multicriteria model to assess the systemic readiness of AI solutions in health, understood as the adequacy between a solution and its application context. Thus, the pair (solution, context) is adopted as the unit of evaluation. In each criterion, what one party requires is compared with what the other is able to offer, identifying gaps that may limit adoption. The criteria are organized into five dimensions, associated with fundamental objectives, and critical criteria can exercise veto, making the model partially non-compensatory.
Views per month
Galoá count, excluding known robots. Updated on 30/09/2026.
Views per month
Galoá count, excluding known robots. Updated on 30/09/2026.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper