To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Academic irregularity in engineering courses presents a complex challenge of resource allocation and time planning. This work proposes and compares two methods of curriculum optimization from the perspective of the individual student: one based on Evolutionary Computation (Genetic Algorithm, GA) and an exact model of Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MIP). The curriculum structure is modeled as an Acyclic Directed Graph (AGD), from which a topological criticality metric used by both methods to prioritize strategic disciplines is derived. Constraints of dynamic prerequisites, schedule availability, and semester workload are incorporated consistently across the two models, allowing for direct comparison under the same semester decision cadence. Experiments with real data from the Systems Engineering course at UFMG, in a protocol of 30 independent executions of the AG, show that the exact model solves each semester the proven optimality in less than a second, while the AG delivers solutions of equivalent quality with stable execution time and no dependence on external solver.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper