To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
3D printing is a relatively recent manufacturing method with significant potential due to its speed, cost-effectiveness, and geometric freedom. However, high variability in quality and mechanical strength limits its widespread industrial application. This study analyzes surface rough ness, cylindricity, and compressive strength across various printing parameters. Supervised learning models were trained for conformal prediction of these responses relative to a defined parameter region and coverage probability, with the objective to compare the confidence of the results. Cons trained optimization was performed on surface quality to maximize compressive strength. Using conformal prediction, the optimization was evaluated at 90 % and 50 % confidence levels. These levels identified two distinct viable regions for optimization for the analyzed settings, with the highest confidence levels presenting lower compressive strength than the lower confidence levels, highlighting the impact of confidence analysis.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper