To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
The use of the Hierarchical Analysis Method as a decision support methodology is highly widespread in the academic literature. However, the correct use of the methodology and its implications must be well structured to avoid bias. In the case of multiple experts' involvement, the use of methodologies for aggregation of judgments or aggregation of experts' priorities must be well-founded and always followed by sensitivity analysis. The objective of this article is to demonstrate that the correct use of the aggregation model as well as sensitivity analysis are fundamental in the decision-making process. Thus, a group decision review, theoretical concepts of AHP, aggregation of judgments and aggregation of priorities, sensitivity analysis, an example of application of AHP using the two aggregation methods, and sensitivity analysis through the exploratory method with the respective results and conclusions are presented.
Views per month
Galoá count, excluding known robots. Updated on 30/09/2026.
Views per month
Galoá count, excluding known robots. Updated on 30/09/2026.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper