To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Accurate very short-term wind power forecasting requires both precise point estimates and reliable uncertainty quantification. This paper evaluates an Gate Spiking Neural Network (GS-NN) pipeline for 1-minute-ahead wind power prediction on the Monash wind power benchmark after resampling to 1-minute resolution. The study compares a baseline spiking neural network (SNN) and two composable innovations, HetSyn and Entropy-Max, against tuned eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Random Forest baselines. The protocol uses a chronological 60/15/10/15 train/validation/calibration/test split, three random seeds, and split-conformal prediction intervals with target coverage 0.90. The best result is obtained by the HetSyn-based SNN ensemble, which achieves a root mean squared error of 0.0596 and outperforms XGBoost, Random Forest, and Light-GBM. Diebold–Mariano tests indicate significant gains over the tree baselines, while the main remaining limitations are undercoverage relative to the nominal confidence level.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper