To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
This work compares statistical and deep learning methods for forecasting cryptocurrency prices and directional movements. Daily price series were analyzed from 11/09/2017 to 12/31/2024 for four crypto assets (Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and Ripple). The statistical methods used were ARIMA and ETS, and the deep learning methods were LSTM, RNN, and GRU. The results indicate that ARIMA and ETS achieved the lowest MAPE values in most asset-horizon combinations, while recurrent models showed stronger directional accuracy, especially at the 7- and 14-day horizons. In the Diebold-Mariano tests applicable to ARIMA, the null hypothesis of equal predictive accuracy relative to the random walk was not rejected in any of the evaluable comparisons. The results therefore reinforce the importance of jointly considering error magnitude, movement direction, and statistical significance when comparing forecasting models.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper