To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Military Organizations of the Brazilian Navy (BN) may become targets of terrorists or Public Order Disturbance Agents (PODA) who illegally confine personnel after invading their facilities. The continuous improvement of Special Operations planning to recover facilities and rescue confined personnel is of strategic interest to the BN. This paper proposes the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), structured through the Strategic Options Development and Analysis (SODA) method, as a decision support tool for comparing Courses of Action (COA) in SRRG-SpecOps emergency planning. A fictional hostage scenario demonstrates the model's capability to incorporate decision-maker preferences transparently, with the criteria structure elicited from qualified Special Operations personnel and all seven judgment matrices satisfying Saaty's consistency threshold. Sensitivity analysis identifies the inversion threshold of every criterion, showing that the recommended solution withstands at least a 9.5 percentage-point displacement in any criterion weight, providing the commander a quantified decision map rather than a single-point recommendation.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper