To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Iron ore concentration by flotation involves multiple interdependent variables, making monitoring and control key to ensuring operational efficiency and product quality. However, many measurements still depend on laboratory analysis, resulting in high response time and delay in operational adjustments. In this work, three algorithms based on decision trees, XGBoost, LightGBM and Random Forest, and two based on neural networks, TabNet and MLP, were compared to predict the iron content in flotation tailings. TabNet had the lowest median MAE, with 1.82, and a mean of 1.85, indicating better performance in absolute error. However, the LightGBM obtained a very close result, with a median of 1.86 and a mean of 1.88, in addition to less dispersion of errors. XGBoost and Random Forest performed mid-range, while MLP underperformed. Thus, LightGBM stood out for the best balance between predictive performance and stability.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper