To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
This article analyzes how Grupo Globo, Folha de S.Paulo, Estadão, and Agência Pública regulate generative artificial intelligence in their editorial guidelines. Based on the Political Economy of Communication, Marxism, and the epistemology of Adelmo Genro Filho, a documentary analysis of the manuals published by the companies between 2023 and 2024 was carried out. It is concluded that the discourse of 'human supervision' operates in commercial conglomerates as a symbolic legitimation that conceals the subsumption of intellectual work and the acceleration of production. While commercial media adheres to algorithmic efficiency and opacity, independent journalism (Agência Pública) establishes discursive ethical counterpoints by prohibiting authorial automation and denouncing the precariousness of big techs. However, this posture faces material limits in the face of the unavoidable dependence on corporate technological infrastructures.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper