This paper was published through Galoá and has a deposited DOI. To cite this paper, use one of the standards below:
In case you are one of the co-authors and want to register this paper in your Lattes, use the following code: doi > 10.17648/cics-2025-213453
If you've NEVER registered a DOI in your Lattes, check our tutorial!This study presents a comparative analysis between the ecological brick (pressed soil-cement) and the traditional ceramic brick, considering technical, economic and environmental factors. The study examines characteristics such as mechanical strength, durability, thermal and acoustic performance, production cost, environmental impact, and possibilities for sustainable construction. The results indicate that the eco-brick offers significant benefits regarding sustainability, including the reduction of CO₂ emissions, the use of local primary materials, and the reduction of mortar consumption. In addition, it contributes to greater environmental comfort and appreciation of the cultural identity of the region. On the other hand, although ceramic brick has a greater environmental impact, it offers greater standardization, resistance, and facilities in the market. It is concluded that the ideal choice depends on the regional context, the specific needs of the construction and the objectives linked to sustainable development. This research contributes to the debate on alternative construction techniques, seeking safer, more efficient and culturally appropriate solutions for the civil construction sector.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper