This paper was published through Galoá and has a deposited DOI. To cite this paper, use one of the standards below:
In case you are one of the co-authors and want to register this paper in your Lattes, use the following code: doi > 10.17648/bctrims-2023-167413
If you've NEVER registered a DOI in your Lattes, check our tutorial!Introduction: The optimal treatment strategy for multiple sclerosis (MS) remains a topic of debate. The classical approach is the escalating (ESC) strategy, which involves initiating treatment with low-to-moderate-efficacy disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) and escalating to high-efficacy DMDs when there is evidence of active disease. Another approach, the early intensive (EIT) strategy, entails starting with high-efficacy DMDs as first-line therapy. However, this approach is limited by safety and cost considerations, particularly in middle-to-low income countries and public health systems. Objective: Our objective was to compare the long-term cost effectiveness of the ESC and EIT strategies, using a cost-effectiveness model tailored to the context of Brazil. Methods: We considered EIT initial strategies with fingolimod, cladribine, natalizumab, alemtuzumab, rituximab, or ocrelizumab. We developed a Markov model with an expected 30% lower increase in EDSS (Expanded Disability Status Scale) in the EIT group, based on a previous meta-analysis conducted by our team. Cost estimates were based on a five-year time horizon, using a previously published EDSS-based model for Brazil, and drug costs were obtained from the official Brazilian government's suggested prices. Results: The drug costs of fingolimod, cladribine, natalizumab, rituximab, and alemtuzumab were similar to the costs of the drugs used in ESC strategies (interferon, glatiramer, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate). However, the EIT strategy was associated with an increase in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and a reduction of R$2073,00 in non-drug related costs over a five-year time horizon. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the EIT strategy can be cost-effective in Brazil, particularly when initiated with natalizumab, rituximab, alemtuzumab, fingolimod, or cladribine. This supports the use of the EIT strategy, rather than the ESC strategy, for the treatment of MS in Brazil.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper