To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Sulfur isotopic analysis is an essential biogeochemical tool in environmental studies. Like carbon and nitrogen, oxidized and reduced sulfur species are usually controlled by biological and thermochemical processes. In oil and natural gas exploration, unwanted sulfur gases are often byproducts of extraction, production, and refining processes. Depending on its concentration, hydrogen sulfide (H2S) can pose complications oil and gas operations since it may contaminate and affect the quality of the produced oil and natural gas. Hydrogen sulfide may be formed by different processes: thermal cracking of kerogen, bacterial metabolism (BSR), and thermochemical pathway (TSR). Isotopic analysis (δ34S) and the H2S concentration allow identifying the process that generated this gas. H2S sampling for δ³⁴S determination is an important step to track possible sulfur isotopic fractionation. An efficient means of sampling is the precipitation of sulfur in the form of sulfide, an inert solid that is easy to handle and transport. In this study, we evaluated the sulfur isotopic fractionation related to the precipitation of Ag2S, ZnS, and CuS from a H2S gas. Hydrogen sulfide was produced by reacting ammonium sulfide and phosphoric acid in a Falcon tube attached to a gas sensor. The produced H2S was pumped through three vials with the following solutions: zinc acetate, silver nitrate, and copper nitrate. Upon bubbling the H2S in the solutions, silver sulfide, zinc sulfide, and copper sulfide precipitates formed in each vial, respectively. The composition of the precipitates was determined by XRD. A fourth experiment was conducted precipitating zinc sulfide following by reaction with silver nitrate, resulting in the precipitation of silver sulfide. For sulfur isotope analyses, an aliquot of 0.5 mg of each sulfide was analyzed using International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) S1 and internal CdS as reference materials. The δ³⁴S of the ammonium sulfide was 12.7‰ and of the sulfide precipitates was: 7.5‰ for Ag2S; 8.1‰ for ZnS; 7.9‰ for the CuS; and 7.7 for the Ag2S of the fourth experiment. In general, the sulfur isotopic fractionation between the ammonium sulfide and the precipitates varied between 4.6 and 5.2‰. One possible cause for this fractionation could be explained by the production reaction of H2S or even by the incomplete consumption of H2S during the sulfide precipitation reactions.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper