To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Reliable uncertainty quantification is essential for critical decisions in time series forecasting, yet many machine learning models focus solely on point estimates. This paper presents a systematic evaluation of regression models, including Linear Regression, Random Forest, and three state-of-the-art boosting models: eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), combined with the Conformal Prediction (CP) framework to generate statistically valid prediction intervals. A unified and reproducible evaluation pipeline is proposed, integrating time-aware cross-validation, lag-based feature engineering, and calibration-based split-conformal prediction. The framework is evaluated on four heterogeneous real-world datasets from the energy, transportation, weather, and retail domains. Results show that empirical coverage frequently falls below the theoretical target due to violations of the exchangeability assumption, while boosting-based models achieve up to 30\% lower pinball loss and more stable prediction intervals.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper