To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
It is assumed that the narrative reconfigurations that are established in the Fourth Narrator when he is affected by the processuality of mediatization are a) movements of systemic reaccommodation, but also – and this is where the research advances – b) a problem of circulation. Thinking about them from this perspective implies, on the one hand, problematizing the concept of journalistic circulation, but also reflecting on the emergence, in this context, of phenomena such as dissonant narratives; in them, the contrast effects. The concept of circulation, along the lines of Veron (203) and Fausto Neto (2018), is interposed in reflection as a hermeneutic key to understanding the phenomenon in question. The approach is qualitative, along the lines of Machado da Silva (2021) and Demo (2000). On the other hand, the strategy of observation, with Ginzburg (1989), indicates, through the analysis of discursive clues that we find reports about Cop 30.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper