To cite this paper use one of the standards below:
Introduction
Regarding qualitative online interviews, the research community is divided between an ‘anything goes’ optimism on the one hand and scepticism about the changes in personal communication on the other. Only rarely is it empirically and socio-theoretically asked which circumstances accompany qualitative online interviews and what potential they have.
Aims and Methods
This paper discusses empirical and theoretical findings on conducting web-based qualitative interviews, in particular concerning personal relationships and the circumstances under which the interview ‘works well.' It is based on my own research, in which I conducted all types of qualitative interviews (narrative, semi-structured, with groups) at the maximum possible distance (asynchronous written, with e-mails and web forums) and analyzed them according to their respective methods of choice. The interviews were considered successful if they enabled the research question to be investigated profitably.
Results
Qualitative interviews are by no means merely a list of open questions which can be adapted from quantitative research, even though this is often practised. They also do not constitute humanistic-romantic or even therapeutic relationships, as they are often portrayed. Instead, decidedly qualitative questioning techniques and not too close relationships generate ‘interaction flows’. This is true face to face, but it is also particularly evident online – though not all qualitative interview methods and therefore not all research objectives work at the maximum distance.
Conclusion
The fact that neither ‘anything goes’ nor romantic relationships between researchers and interviewees necessarily lead to fluent communication can be demonstrated particularly well in asynchronous interviews. Therefore, online interviews not only can lead to good data (under certain circumstances). They also encourage us to tailor qualitative interview methods more closely to research questions and thus use them in a more informed way.This is also associated with the limitations of online methods.
With nearly 200,000 papers published, Galoá empowers scholars to share and discover cutting-edge research through our streamlined and accessible academic publishing platform.
Learn more about our products:
This proceedings is identified by a DOI , for use in citations or bibliographic references. Attention: this is not a DOI for the paper and as such cannot be used in Lattes to identify a particular work.
Check the link "How to cite" in the paper's page, to see how to properly cite the paper