WHO IS GOING TO MISS US? UNDERSTANDING ATTRITION IN MIXED-MODE LONGITUDINAL SURVEYS

Vol. 23, 2024 - 338736
Pôster - Envio de trabalho completo
Favoritar este trabalho
Como citar esse trabalho?
Resumo

This study examines the determinants and consequences of attrition in longitudinal surveys, with a focus on its implications for representativeness and causal inference. Selective attrition may introduce bias and compromise the validity of statistical inference. The study addresses this challenge by investigating whether nonresponse is ignorable under a Missing at Random (MAR) framework and evaluating the effectiveness of methodological and operational strategies to mitigate selection bias. Using data from the DZC Project, the analysis combines three complementary approaches. First, it assesses the relationship between attrition and observed individual characteristics, testing the plausibility of different missing data mechanisms. Second, it evaluates whether standard weighting adjustments are sufficient to restore representativeness across survey waves. Third, it examines the role of survey design, particularly the use of mixed-mode data collection strategies, in reducing selection bias. Additionally, the study distinguishes between different types of nonresponse—refusal, non-contact, and procrastination—and investigates the predictive power of baseline paradata for future attrition. The results indicate that attrition is not consistent with a Missing Completely at Random (MCAR) process but can be plausibly treated as MAR when conditioning on observed characteristics. Weighting strategies are generally effective in maintaining representativeness, although their performance varies across subgroups. Mixed-mode designs improve response rates and help recover harder-to-reach respondents, thereby reducing selection bias. Paradata emerge as valuable predictors of attrition, offering practical insights for cost-effective fieldwork planning. Overall, findings contribute to the methodological literature on missing data and provide evidence-based guidance for the design and implementation of longitudinal surveys in middle-income country contexts.

Compartilhe suas ideias ou dúvidas com os autores!

Sabia que o maior estímulo no desenvolvimento científico e cultural é a curiosidade? Deixe seus questionamentos ou sugestões para o autor!

Faça login para interagir

Tem uma dúvida ou sugestão? Compartilhe seu feedback com os autores!

Instituições
  • 1 University of Pennsylvania
  • 2 Unicamp
Temática
  • Aspectos metodológicos
Palavras-chave
Missing data (Statistics)
Longitudinal Survey
Data analytics
Mixed-Modes (Data Collection)